Another Brazilian airport privatisation package is moving towards fruition, but the pickings keep getting slimmer

Brazil’s regulator ANAC has approved draft documentation for the concession of 12 airports. The concession process was set in motion on 29-Nov-2018. This is the fourth concession tranche in the country since the process began in 2011.

The fourth tranche of airport concessions in Brazil has received ANAC approval for 12 facilities across the country, separated into three groups;
Each has an ‘anchor’ airport of sorts but with one exception those airports are getting smaller and less appealing;
The question now is what priority (if any) will the very small ones be given by the concessionaires?
Others have previously included São Paulo Guarulhos, Brasilia and Campinas Viracopos airports (Tranche #1); Rio de Janeiro Galeão and Belo Horizonte Tancredo Neves airports (Tranche #2); and Porto Alegre and Salvador airports (Tranche #3).

It is has not been an entirely satisfactory procedure with some well-above-expectations deals contrasting with disappointing traffic statistics as Brazil’s economy turned for the worse. The economy is slightly improved but it is a long time since Brazil was the “star B in the BRICs”.

A change of government may see the new Bolsonaro one, together with its Economy Minister, Paulo Guedes, a student both of Milton Friedman and the ‘Chicago Boys’ who revitalised the Chilean economy, turn to the free market reforms that succeeded in doing that in Brazil’s neighbour.

None of this has actually diverted interest in these concessions from domestic and international investors alike. Airport investors, unlike airline ones, are in it for the long-term. It is known that at least four of them would like to take over the Campinas Viracopos concession, including Flughafen Zurich, Brazilian private equity turnaround specialist IG4 Capital, and Chinese conglomerate Alibaba, as previously highlighted by The Blue Swan Daily.

Indeed, Flughafen Zurich, which has been investing in Latin America since before Brazil became the highflying BRIC, has indicated it would like to bid on all three of the blocks in the forthcoming tranche. In a way that is surprising because the process is now down to much smaller airports than before, the bone in the Brazilian expression ‘steak with bone’. So is there any steak in there? Are there, as in the Mexican concessions procedure, any ‘anchor’ airports?

There do appear to be what might be described as anchor airports, with between 2.9 million and 6.8 million passengers in 2017. They are Recife Guararapes (Northeast Group); Cuiaba Marechal Rondon (Central/West Group) and Vitoria Eurico Sales (Southeast Group). Their growth performance in 2017 was varied at between +4% and -3%, but that is not dramatic. The groups also include airports with traffic as low as 0.5 mppa in the Northeast Group and 0.18 mppa in the Southeast Group (statistics are patchy for the Central/West Group).

While airports offer alternative business development opportunities such as cargo, trading and logistics parks (even ‘airport cities’), maintenance, storage/breakage and a myriad of other aero and non-aero uses, an investor will usually look at the size of the passenger market first and whether there is a reasonable prospect of it being extended.

Taking the largest and most promising in this respect, Recife’s Guararapes airport, Recife is the fourth-largest urban agglomeration in Brazil, with four million inhabitants. That makes it a better ‘bet’ than Florianópolis (1.1 million) where Flughafen Zurich took on the concession in 2017. It is also on the coast and along with Fortaleza and Salvador, which were concessioned to Fraport and Vinci respectively in the third tranche, and Natal, which featured in the first tranche, the nearest air entry point to Europe and Africa.

International services already exist at Recife, amounting to a modest 6.3% of capacity but foreign non-Latin American carriers have made little impact with TAP Air Portugal and Air Europa amounting to only 2.7% of capacity between them. So there clearly is plenty of scope at Recife and has to be described far and away as the star prize in this set of deals

Regulations are eased opening expanded US Airport Privatisation programme to any airport

The Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) reauthorisation bill which was passed by Congress this autumn contained a provision which passed under the radar outside the United States of America (USA). It considerably expanded what was known as the Airport Privatisation Pilot Programme, enacted by Congress in 1996 and then slightly expanded from five to 10 airports in 2012.

Summary:

The US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has expanded the country’s airport privatisation programme;
Any airport can now be leased without limit and FAA grants available to analyse any potential leases;
But there has been no change yet on airline double super-majority authorisation rule.
Airport privatisation was a new and untried idea in the US in 1996, and the regulations framing the original pilot programme reflected that. It permitted only five airports to be leased in the long-term. Only one of those could be a ‘large hub’ according to the FAA’s interpretation and at least one must be a general aviation (GA) airport. It also imposed a lengthy and convoluted approval process, by airlines serving the airport in question and by the FAA.

The first change made by Section 160 of the FAA reauthorisation act removes the numerical and categorical limitations. Henceforth, any US airport may be long-term leased, and without limit. That means the situation that prevailed for six years, when the City of Chicago held the only “slot” in the programme reserved for a large hub airport (Midway), cannot re-occur. The proposed lease of one large hub cannot hold up or preclude other large hubs from seeking to do likewise.

Accordingly, the programme has been renamed the Airport Investment Partnership Programme and that ‘partnership’ insertion suggests the future importance of public-private partnerships (P3s). Moreover, the term ‘privatisation’ as used in the UK and some other European countries generally means the sale of all or part of the ownership of the airport in question although it can also refer to any financial involvement by a private company.

Since both the 1996 US pilot programme law and the 2018 revised version permit only long-term leases, these deals are inherently long-term P3s between the airport owner (city, county, state, etc.) and the private consortium that wins a competitive process to lease, improve, operate, and manage the airport.

Another important change is that henceforth long-term P3 leases can be structured in a way in which the public-sector partner has a part-interest in the special-purpose entity created to manage and operate the airport for the term of the lease. Such shared-control agreements are increasingly common in Europe, notably France and Germany.

Politically, that may reduce opposition to US airport P3 leases created by fear that the public entity will “lose control” of the airport (although that can be addressed in the long-term lease agreement by a range of negotiated performance measures, etc.).

Another highly significant change is that while the previous law permitted the FAA to exempt the airport owner from having to repay previous federal airport grants if it leased the airport, the new law automatically exempts the airport owner from having to do this. This removes an obstacle that increased the risk of potential US airport P3 deals compared to foreign ones.

In another small but important change, the new law will make it easier for airport owners to make serious assessments of whether to make use of long-term P3 leases. Doing this responsibly requires detailed legal and financial analysis, which is generally beyond the experience of city or state legal and financial staff. The new law allows the FAA to make grants of up to USD750,000 to any US airport that wishes to analyse whether, and how to go about, engaging in P3 leases under the Airport Investment Partnership Programme.

There is some disappointment that the new law did not change one provision of the original pilot programme that is considered a uniquely US obstacle to getting privatisation approval, namely the requirement for airline approval of the deal via a double super-majority. Specifically, 65% of all the airlines serving the airport must approve the deal terms and also airlines representing at least 65% of the annual landed weight at the airport. In other words a majority of airlines could approve a lease but it might be blocked by the largest of them in terms of movements.

The good news on this issue is that airlines involved with three such long-term P3 lease deals have accepted the negotiated deal terms that were acceptable to private-sector bidders. Those were Southwest Airlines at Midway Airport before the procedure was withdrawn, American Airlines and JetBlue Airways at San Juan International in Puerto Rico and American, JetBlue and United Airlines at Westchester County, NY, a procedure still in limbo. So there is at least historical precept in such cases.

The airports currently in the privatisation programme that are outstanding appear in the table below. in the case the definition ‘Outstanding’ can mean a long time:

Source: The Blue Swan Daily

Low-cost Airlines Want to Join in on the Sofia Airport Concession

The deadline for submitting tenders for the Sofia Airport concession was extended due to the great interest of the candidates in the procedure. This was announced by Minister of Transport Rosen Zhelyazkov during the forum «Entrepreneurship, Development, Perspectives», which took place in Pomorie. In his words, specifically interested in the airport are budget airlines, reports money.bg

«The interest of the low-cost companies at Sofia Airport is enormous, many of the big European operators are asking questions, so we extended the bidding period in the concession procedure by January 29,» Zhelyazkov said, quoted by the GERB press office. The Secretary of State has not identified specific companies that have shown interest in the airport concession. The most significant presence at the airport in the capital by low-cost companies are the Hungarian WizzAir and the Irish Ryanair . Flights from and to Sofia also have the British EasyJet. However, these companies do not develop business as airport operators.

So far confirmed interest in the concession comes from the British company Manchester Airport Group (MAG), which confirmed in October that they will participate in the procedure together with the Chinese Beijing Engineering Engeneering Group. The company operates three airports in the UK – Manchester, London Stansted and the East Midlands.

Later it became clear that the Spanish AENA would also be included in the race for Sofia Airport. It is the world’s largest airport operator by number of passengers, managing 46 airports in Spain, holding a share of Luton Airport in London and managing another 15 airports in South America. As possible participants in the procedure were also the Spanish Ferrovial, which manages airports in the UK and has participated in Heathrow, as well as several French companies. They are Bouygues, as well as Groupe ADP, which operates 26 airports, including Paris’ Charles de Gaulle, Orly and Boulevard. Participation can also be made by the airport operator in Burgas and Varna Fraport, as well as by another French company – Alliance Avia. According to the information, there could also be a Greek side with the company Terna, as well as with Italian companies.

Source: Novonite

Spain’s Ferrovial, Canada’s PSP eye GVK Airport stake

Canada’s Public Sector Pension Investment Board, or PSP Investments, and Spanish airport operator Ferrovial,
which runs Heathrow of London, among others, are the two final suitors advancing on a large share purchase in GVK Airport Holdings, people directly familiar with the matter said.
GVK owns and operates the country’s second busiest Mumbai International Airport, and will manage the proposed Navi Mumbai International Airport too. Citigroup is said to be advising the transaction, which could conclude with one of the two bidders in the next two months. Financial details of the potential transaction could not be ascertained at this stage.

Earlier this month, GVK Power & Infrastructure sought shareholder nod to sell over 50% stake in the privately held airports holding company for raising up to Rs 8,000 crore. The capital raised will be deployed to pare debt and for developing the Navi Mumbai airport. GVK Airport Holdings has over Rs 8,000-crore debt, while the group’s overall debt hang is well over Rs 20,000 crore.
One of the sources cited earlier said the share sale to one of the bidders would be up to 49%. However, GVK Airport is likely to go ahead with an IPO plan sometime next year, which would see the promoter stake fall below 50%. The company is a fully owned subsidiary of GVK Power & Infrastructure.
PSP and Ferrovial were in the final lap after the latest phase of protracted deal-making in GVK Airport had attracted several bidders, including Australian infrastructure investor AMP Capital, Abu Dhabi Investment Authority and Malaysia Airports, among others.

Source: The Times of India (Business)